Author Topic: K engine driving an ultralight  (Read 9170 times)

Offline FranK75

  • Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 11
K engine driving an ultralight
« on: November 14, 2015, 09:57:12 PM »
The K engines are powerful, high output for their weight, reliable. I am considering using a K75 engine to power an ultralight airplane. May have to shave off weight where ever possible.
  • Murrells Inlet, SC
  • K75

Offline Chaos

  • Administrator
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 3157
  • Mars needs women!
Re: K engine driving an ultralight
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2015, 10:07:09 PM »
good ones are pretty cheap on the market too.  Not sure how you'd shave weight aside from the transmission & clutch.  Maybe lighten the flywheel.
  • sw ohio
1987 K75S    VIN 0231
Original owner, Original litter
200,000 miles (plus or minus) and 5 paint jobs
sold 6/23
2023 Ural 2WD sidecar (BMW's bastard step child)

Offline FranK75

  • Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 11
Re: K engine driving an ultralight
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2015, 10:11:57 PM »
I would grind off as much aluminum as possible from all over the engine
  • Murrells Inlet, SC
  • K75

Offline Chaos

  • Administrator
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 3157
  • Mars needs women!
Re: K engine driving an ultralight
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2015, 11:36:38 PM »
Seen R100 and 1100 engines on ultralites and small planes.  Makes sense, no radiator to worry about
  • sw ohio
1987 K75S    VIN 0231
Original owner, Original litter
200,000 miles (plus or minus) and 5 paint jobs
sold 6/23
2023 Ural 2WD sidecar (BMW's bastard step child)

Offline Mongrel

  • ^ Proficient Motobricker
  • Posts: 205
Re: K engine driving an ultralight
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2015, 01:08:03 AM »
Yeah, maybe something air-cooled would have a better power-to-weight ratio? Not sure, but worth looking into!
'86 K75c
'79 Motobecane Mobylette (mothballed)

Offline FranK75

  • Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 11
Re: K engine driving an ultralight
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2015, 10:34:40 AM »
Great points on the air cooled. Thanks - makes more sense.

Frank
  • Murrells Inlet, SC
  • K75

Offline wmax351

  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 1237
Re: K engine driving an ultralight
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2015, 11:49:55 AM »
Air-oil cooled R11's or R12's are probably a better bet. The oil cooler can be thermostatically controlled, and potentially controlled with flaps. Also, carbureted and can be set up with dual plugs and (potentially) magnetos. Don't want engine failure from electrical failure. That way you can duplicate critical parts.

Counter Balancer adds some weight too.

BMW bike engines are good for this, they have a high duty rating, and separate engine/transmission.

You will need to consider the thrust loading on the output shaft. If you are doing a reduction drive (which I would assume you are) that will take care of it.

  • Albuquerque, NM
  • 91 BMW K75 Standard, 98 Moto Guzzi California EV
Bikes:
Current:1991 BMW K75 Standard, 1998 Moto Guzzi California EV11
Past: '83 BMW R65LS, '75 Honda CB550F, '69 Honda CB175, 1999 Royal Enfield Bullet 500, 1973 Triumph Tiger TR7V, 1971 BMW R75/5 in Toaster outfit, 1979 Harley Davidson XLS-1000 Sportster Roadster

Offline F14CRAZY

  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 1091
  • Grand Rapids, MI
  • '87 K75C
'87 K75C w/ Pichler V1 fairing. LED's, CATZ driving lights, Audiovox cruise, LT top case, tons of other mods by Drake...


Offline Laitch

  • Faster than a speeding pullet
  • Administrator
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 11299
Re: K engine driving an ultralight
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2015, 01:12:39 PM »
It'd be more adventuresome to use a Ural engine; however, you'd probably be making shorter flights. :hehehe
  • Along the Ridley in Vermont.
  • 1995 K75 89,000 miles

Offline FranK75

  • Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 11
Re: K engine driving an ultralight
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2015, 10:50:43 PM »
No problem. I would bring lots of tools and spare parts.
  • Murrells Inlet, SC
  • K75

Offline Chaos

  • Administrator
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 3157
  • Mars needs women!
Re: K engine driving an ultralight
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2015, 11:26:30 PM »
It'd be more adventuresome to use a Ural engine; however, you'd probably be making shorter flights. :hehehe

As a rabid Uraligist I resent that remark though I cannot argue with it  :giggles
  • sw ohio
1987 K75S    VIN 0231
Original owner, Original litter
200,000 miles (plus or minus) and 5 paint jobs
sold 6/23
2023 Ural 2WD sidecar (BMW's bastard step child)

Offline F14CRAZY

  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 1091
Re: K engine driving an ultralight
« Reply #11 on: December 10, 2015, 05:53:20 AM »
How about a Chang Jiang engine?
  • Grand Rapids, MI
  • '87 K75C
'87 K75C w/ Pichler V1 fairing. LED's, CATZ driving lights, Audiovox cruise, LT top case, tons of other mods by Drake...


Tags: