Author Topic: K1100 v K100  (Read 3952 times)

Offline Cafe racer

  • Café racer
  • Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 35
K1100 v K100
« on: October 02, 2020, 07:53:11 PM »
Considering buying a K1100LT 60km.
Are these better than the K100?

What are the main improvements, I see in the photo, that it has the torque arm on the driveshaft.

Any know issues that the K100 doesn't have?

Any comments much appreciated.
  • Japan
  • K100RS 1988 2 valve

Offline rbm

  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 2308
Re: K1100 v K100
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2020, 08:45:44 PM »
In my opinion, K1100 is an all 'round better choice than the K100.  Still as reliable as an appliance, just like the K100.
  • Regards, Robert
Toronto, Ontario

1987 K75 - Build Blog @http://k75retro.blogspot.ca/
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Offline Chaos

  • Administrator
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 3157
  • Mars needs women!
Re: K1100 v K100
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2020, 09:58:39 PM »
4 valve instead of 2 valve, better brakes, newer FI, Paralever rear, more HP, 2nd gen ABS (after 1993) yeah, go for the 1100
  • sw ohio
1987 K75S    VIN 0231
Original owner, Original litter
200,000 miles (plus or minus) and 5 paint jobs
sold 6/23
2023 Ural 2WD sidecar (BMW's bastard step child)
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Offline Cafe racer

  • Café racer
  • Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 35
Re: K1100 v K100
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2020, 10:58:56 PM »
4 valve instead of 2 valve, better brakes, newer FI, Paralever rear, more HP, 2nd gen ABS (after 1993) yeah, go for the 1100

without knowing the year, can I tell if 2nd gen ABS visually
  • Japan
  • K100RS 1988 2 valve

Offline Laitch

  • Faster than a speeding pullet
  • Administrator
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 11299
Re: K1100 v K100
« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2020, 12:57:22 AM »
On models with ABS 2 there is one pressure regulator that isn't easily visible so your photo is of a 1994 or later model.

If a K1100 has ABS 1 you'd see a cylindrical pressure modulator above the footpeg plate on each side—like the one in the photo below.

Approximate weights according to Phil Hawksley's BMBikes site:
1988 K100RS 249kg
K1100RS 268kg
K1100LT 290kg
  • Along the Ridley in Vermont.
  • 1995 K75 89,000 miles

Offline koapono

  • ^ Proficient Motobricker
  • Posts: 276
Re: K1100 v K100
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2020, 04:17:51 PM »
not BETTER, just different!
I have an 85 K100RS and a 93 K1100LT, love them both but they each have their own personality.
The RS with short bars and "sort of" forward leaning riding position has that speed-racer feel to it. Requires a little more effort to turn and flow with the twisties although effort diminishes as speed increases. Tis the reason for a folder full of speeding tickets.
The LT is an all-day rider! Designed for the long haul. If you buy it, throw some radials on it and you'll swear you're riding a brand new bike as compared to the RS.
Keep both if you can but if you must choose I'd go with the LT only because I'm old and decrepit. I've become more a tourer than a peg dragger.
g'luck
  • prince george, VA (25 miles south of richmond)
  • 1994 K1100LT

Offline Cafe racer

  • Café racer
  • Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 35
Re: K1100 v K100
« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2020, 05:35:53 PM »
koapono, many thanks, I love the riding position the RS, previous bikes have been S1000RR and two S1000R's
Bike before the KRS was a R1150 Rockster, awesome riding position, but it was a hot bike in the 35degC plus weather.. and thirsty for the engine oil. So you can see my bikes are getting older, so am I (61)
  • Japan
  • K100RS 1988 2 valve

Offline Skunky

  • ^ SuperNatural Motobricker
  • Posts: 525
Re: K1100 v K100
« Reply #7 on: October 04, 2020, 06:25:01 PM »
Cafe Racer. If (as your pseudonym suggests), you are intending to build a cafe racer the K1100 is a better choice. The 4 valve has a different fuelling system from the 2v which allows you to replace the air box with pods or cone filters etc. It's slightly more refined than the K100's and tends to sell for a little more money.  As for riding position you buy a bike and pick your own. Either way these are great bikes with unbreakable engines. I love mine
  • Derby GB
  • BMW K100lt
Rebuild it and they will come..
90 K100lt
Triumph Thruxton 900
Honda CB400F
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Offline Cafe racer

  • Café racer
  • Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 35
Re: K1100 v K100
« Reply #8 on: October 05, 2020, 08:58:07 AM »
Cafe Racer. If (as your pseudonym suggests), you are intending to build a cafe racer the K1100 is a better choice. The 4 valve has a different fuelling system from the 2v which allows you to replace the air box with pods or cone filters etc. It's slightly more refined than the K100's and tends to sell for a little more money.  As for riding position you buy a bike and pick your own. Either way these are great bikes with unbreakable engines. I love mine
Skunky, Not sure of my plans with the bike, will know more after this wednesday when I pick it up... my solo riding style is RS, but with my lady on the back maybe the LT.. if its made into a cafe racer... so be it..
  • Japan
  • K100RS 1988 2 valve

Offline Cafe racer

  • Café racer
  • Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 35
Re: K1100 v K100
« Reply #9 on: October 11, 2020, 08:02:09 PM »
Thanks for the comments the bike turned out to be very rough, the clutch was slipping in all gears on the flat when accelerating. So I didn't buy it...
  • Japan
  • K100RS 1988 2 valve

Offline Past-my-Prime

  • ^ SuperNatural Motobricker
  • Posts: 581
  • All of us are better when we're loved.
Re: K1100 v K100
« Reply #10 on: October 12, 2020, 08:29:15 PM »
What's a new clutch run for one of those? $350?  Plus you get to check the splines. . .
  • North Shore of Lake Superior (in my garage)
  • BRICK: 1989 K75 RT - Rocinante; NON-BRICK: 2007 F650 GS Dakar - Betty Blue

Offline K1300S

  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 1293
Re: K1100 v K100
« Reply #11 on: October 12, 2020, 08:43:17 PM »
clutches are easy on these bikes.  and, as mentioned, ya gotta do the splines anyway....and the clutch o-ring, and the rear main seal.   its all one afternoons worth of work.
Project Thread "K75s Midlife Refresh"
http://www.motobrick.com/index.php/topic,7810.0.html

Offline rbm

  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 2308
Re: K1100 v K100
« Reply #12 on: October 12, 2020, 08:50:29 PM »
Might just be an adjustment.
  • Regards, Robert
Toronto, Ontario

1987 K75 - Build Blog @http://k75retro.blogspot.ca/

Offline Cafe racer

  • Café racer
  • Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 35
Re: K1100 v K100
« Reply #13 on: November 03, 2020, 12:25:40 AM »
thanks to all for comments
  • Japan
  • K100RS 1988 2 valve

Offline warmshed

  • Curious
  • Posts: 9
Re: K1100 v K100
« Reply #14 on: January 15, 2021, 11:13:24 AM »
The paralever makes the bike handle much better
  • london
  • K1

Tags: