A cupala days ago I was reading this thread and noticed a disagree comment was registered on the first post. I thought, how can you disagree with a first post, who would disagree with a first post? I clicked on it and it was me. I tried to undo it but couldn't. Not the first time I've done that either.
Musta been half asleep at the time, dunno.
Oops.
@uldy, I'm thinking your problem is likely to be a worn bearing more so than the tabs. There are past cases similar to yours; Rhoads rash, bgcameron, and MLR over at the K100-forum, to name a few. If the bearing is at the earliest stages of wear, then tightening the clutch nut could help, if very worn, the rattle would continue, regardless of how much torque is applied to the clutch nut.
I'm happy to be corrected, but I can't see how the tabs theory fits.
This problem has been solved in the past, buy replacing worn parts or torquing the clutch nut, but I don't think it's ever been fixed by altering the tabs.
Some people have reported no tab wear marks, I haven't found any comments that there was wear.
Cameron described an irregular clatter, sometimes just once while on level ground, but more when going slightly uphill. I don't think that should alter if it's caused by tabs banging around.
Let's say for a minute it is caused by power pulses banging the tabs around. At 3500rpm, it wouldn't knock just once out of thousands of pulses. Output shaft endfloat could match those symptoms though. With a three cylinder engine having one and a half power pulses per revolution, at 3500 rpm that's 5250 pulses. That's 87 clacks per second. I'm pretty sure he's not getting that.
I haven't found an example yet of an early model K75 with a high rev rattle from the output shaft, including yours. Don't know why they're always late models, but somewhere along the line the idle gear spring was replaced with a shim, but I've only read about a small number of the total cases.
In the design stage I think the K75 had an output shaft similar to the K100 but the absorber dampers just got knocked around too much due to the unbalance of three cylinders. So a balance shaft was chosen, good idea. One side affect of this afterthought is that it has lost the benefit of the extra diaphragm spring inside the absorber housing.
I think the only reason for the tabs is so that that balance weights are phased correctly. The tabs are offset so that the balance shaft can only be installed one way.
I don't think there's a BMW service bulletin about solving an output shaft noise problem by altering the tabs, but there is a service bulletin about replacing worn parts to solve this problem.