Author Topic: Front fork tuning question  (Read 1881 times)

Offline AndreP

  • Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 41
Front fork tuning question
« on: September 02, 2025, 03:04:01 PM »
90 k75 rt with f&s “s” suspension
I’ve rebuilt them, replaced the steering bearings, and aligned them. My only problem left is a slight wobble on turn in and while leaned over still originating at the wheel or in one of the forks itself. This is especially noticeable when riding aggressively. I did notice that it disappeared, however, when I ride two up. So my tuning question. With the progressive springs in the front there is also a 1 1/4 inch pvc in each fork, do we think that’s the culprit? Too much preload?  Or is it possible that the increased pre load in the rear helped reduce the bouncing affect from the old suspension? For reference I weigh about 180 pounds without gear. I spent a long time getting my forks perfectly lined up and don’t want to pull them if I don’t need to. I also plan on replacing my rear shock with the ikon one from euromoto electrics soon.
Thanks!
  • CT-RI
  • 1990 BMW K75 RT
Battling electrical demons

Offline Duckbubbles

  • ^ Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 56
Re: Front fork tuning question
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2025, 09:46:27 AM »
First thing I would suspect is the front tire.  Sometimes the only way to eliminate that is to install a new one and see what happens.  Also, a good inspection of the wheel while you are changing the tire.

Frank
  • Austin, Texas USA
  • 1985 K100/1100RS
'85 K100/1100RS 40 years, 331,000 mi.
'23 R1250RS
'03 R1100S BCR #6/200
500,000+ BMW miles

Offline Laitch

  • Faster than a speeding pullet
  • Administrator
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 11299
Re: Front fork tuning question
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2025, 11:51:03 AM »
Too much preload?  Or is it possible that the increased pre load in the rear helped reduce the bouncing affect from the old suspension?
Did you adjust the damper rod length in both tubes? Have you ever measured front sag? Which fork oil viscosity are you using. I think you're on the right track considering weight, if a defective tire isn't in the picture. The answer to these questions could shed some light on the situation.

  • Along the Ridley in Vermont.
  • 1995 K75 89,000 miles

Offline frankenduck

  • Adrninistrator
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 5511
Re: Front fork tuning question
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2025, 01:07:34 PM »
Did you put the axle and wheel on before you tightened the four fork brace bolts?
Once I had a Collie pup. Dug a hole and covered him up. Now I sit there by the hour. Waiting for a Collie-flower.
New to K bikes? Click here.
K Bike Maintenance & Mods: Click here.
Buy parts here.

Offline AndreP

  • Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 41
Re: Front fork tuning question
« Reply #4 on: September 03, 2025, 02:57:03 PM »
Fresh bel ray 7 or 7.5 weight oil
Aligned the front wheel using the axle test, if I loose ln the axle clamps and nut I can spin with my hand to this day
I’ve had a different (older) set of wheels and had the same behavior

Could someone walk me through front sag measurement
  • CT-RI
  • 1990 BMW K75 RT
Battling electrical demons

Offline Laitch

  • Faster than a speeding pullet
  • Administrator
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 11299
Re: Front fork tuning question
« Reply #5 on: September 03, 2025, 03:00:23 PM »
Could someone walk me through front sag measurement
Did you adjust the damper rod length in both tubes?
  • Along the Ridley in Vermont.
  • 1995 K75 89,000 miles

Offline AndreP

  • Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 41
Re: Front fork tuning question
« Reply #6 on: September 03, 2025, 03:01:30 PM »
No I just left everything where it was in length.
  • CT-RI
  • 1990 BMW K75 RT
Battling electrical demons

Offline Kaos

  • Vlad the Extractor
  • ^ Proficient Motobricker
  • Posts: 241
Re: Front fork tuning question
« Reply #7 on: September 03, 2025, 04:01:11 PM »
What was.the amount of oil added When you rebuild the suspension, 7.5, under spec or un equal filling could lead to sag and wobble when riding. When 2 up more weight is added making them more sturdy.
I believe in rest the sag is/should be 10/20 mm,, to about 40mm when sitting on the bike.
Maybe using /switching to 10 suits your riding style better
Front measurement can be done Balkan style.
Place the bike in the center stand, let your partner sit on the back, measure the fully extended suspension. Then measure it with just the bike standing with no stand and no rider/passenger and then again with preferably you sitting on the bike.
This could also be achieved using a scissor lift .
  • Basically Everywhere
  • 1988 K100 RT; 1988 K100 LT; 1989 K 100 LS
"When Kaos reigns, bolts shall break" - Vlad the extractor, 2024

Offline Laitch

  • Faster than a speeding pullet
  • Administrator
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 11299
Re: Front fork tuning question
« Reply #8 on: September 04, 2025, 12:14:16 AM »
Sag is something riders should understand. Our Bricks have the most basic type of damping because, as Henning says in the video, it's cheaper to make. It also is suitable for the type of riding done by most of us, so sag adjustment of the fork is not really necessary and not easy to do. To make our forks more responsive, installing emulators would be an improvement.

The image is of the dampers in the sport fork to which I was referring concerning adjustment. I guess we're beyond that. The first video discusses sag and the second is about emulators and their installation.

As Kaos suggested, changing fork oil weight could be all that is necessary to make your ride acceptable, although a rear shock with compression and rebound damping could also improve overall suspension performance.









  • Along the Ridley in Vermont.
  • 1995 K75 89,000 miles

Tags: