I appreciate all the advice! At this point I'm going to regroup and continue to get this old brick running, but would really like a bike that'll be reliable once it's running.
Your persistence is admirable.
Motorcycles can be alluring enough to overcome better judgement. They are brilliant machines the workings of which are much more exposed to elements than cars and trucks. Despite that exposure, most can take hard usage if they get regular riding and maintenance. Regular riding dries the works and retards corrosion of electrical components. Regular maintenance—including washing—allows the mechanical parts to fully function.
It seems many prospective K-riders riders here don't realize that a neglected bike is likely to be a nest of problems, despite the site's being filled with anguished stories of their sometime costly and time-consuming challenges. If the purchaser of a neglected bike has undeveloped mechanical skill to attend to those problems or constraints on time to remedy them, frustration is usually the result.
Patience, persistence, self-education and often unexpected expenses are needed to get a neglected bike back on the road. With some bikes even that isn't enough. Those bikes are the ones that might be sold with ads reading,
Ran well when it was parked a few years ago. Needs a tuneup and should be good to go.
You'll most likely get this bike underway with the help you get here and from other resources. How reliable it will be is a matter of how thoroughly you have pored over its systems, and luck. The best chance of getting a reliable ride that isn't labor-intensive or high-maintenance is to understand all the advantages and quirks of the type of bike that is wanted and to buy one that has been well-ridden throughout its recent ownership.
Keep asking and we'll keep answering.
. . . so if you'll bare with me . . .
Disappointing as it might be, I intend to remain clothed, here anyway. :giggles