Author Topic: K75: add shock pre-load spacer  (Read 15627 times)

Offline stryder

  • ^ Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 53
K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« on: August 18, 2014, 12:52:14 PM »
Has anybody here added a spacer/collar to his rear shock so more pre-load can be dialed in than stock settings?

I added an approx. 13 mm wide, abs plumbing spacer/collar between the stepped pre-load ramp, and the washer at the top of the spring, with the shock mounted, to try and add some ride height and extend service life as opposed to spending large on a new shock as the damping still seems okay.

Haven't had it on the road yet to evaluate, but this type of thing has worked in the past with other bikes I've had. Just wondering if anybody else here has done that and if so, what were your results.
Southern Ontario, Canada.

Offline johnny

  • TrailBrakingThrottleWhacker
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 7652
  • Whacking...n...Chopping Sliding...n...High Siding
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2014, 03:02:22 PM »
greetings stryder...

welcome to motobrick.com...

i wanna make sure i understand... the value of the well being of your passenger is the cost of a 13mm wide collar made from abs rigged to your 27 year old shock...

j o
  • :johnny i parks my 96 eleven hundert rs motobrick in dodge county cheezconsin  :johnny

Offline stryder

  • ^ Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 53
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2014, 03:41:25 PM »
greetings stryder...

welcome to motobrick.com...

i wanna make sure i understand... the value of the well being of your passenger is the cost of a 13mm wide collar made from abs rigged to your 27 year old shock...

j o

LOL...hahaha..different forum, same question.  :bmwsmile

Same answer: has anybody else done this, and if so, what were the results?

I think it may be a quick and inexpensive way, if not a creative and ingenious way, to help breath some life into a worn spring. I don't see a safety issue here. Additonal preload spacers are not uncommon. I just came up with a way of adding one to a K 75 shock, that apparently are unrebuildable. I'd rather see how this works than spend a grand on a new shock.

(By the way, since you're all up for safety, and who isn't?, stay away from the Progressive Suspension K75 replacment shock. The one I had blew a seal..2 up...at speed. Good thing I'm an experienced rider and could feel the difference in handling and didn't lean into the exit ramp. Cleaned up the huge mess, and rode home in limp mode...hence, I'm looking to keep what I have...the original shock, rather than put my passenger in harms way with another aftermarket shock. :2thumbup:)
Southern Ontario, Canada.

Offline TimTyler

  • Adrninistrator
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 1884
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2014, 04:53:27 PM »
The cheapo Progressive 412 K75 shock is a almost a POS and is still probably a step-up from the K75 OEM shock from what I've read.

I eventually upgraded from a 412 to a Progressive 465 and it performs much better, for less than half of "a grand".

Modifying a rear shock with a plastic spacer sounds like a recipe for disaster to me.

Offline F14CRAZY

  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 1091
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #4 on: August 18, 2014, 05:49:27 PM »
I got thinking of posting and asking about the stock shock today...not exactly about a spacer but the stock shock I'm running (replacing a leaking Progressive 412...hey it was $25) does seem to be a bit worn. I have it set for max preloaded but it's bottomed out a few times on Michigan roads (that probably explains it). Its just been me (144 lbs), the fiance (like 115 lbs), and the LT top case and Integral side cases (all pretty much empty). Don't know how a pair of 200 lbs riders w/ luggage would manage
  • Grand Rapids, MI
  • '87 K75C
'87 K75C w/ Pichler V1 fairing. LED's, CATZ driving lights, Audiovox cruise, LT top case, tons of other mods by Drake...


Offline johnny

  • TrailBrakingThrottleWhacker
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 7652
  • Whacking...n...Chopping Sliding...n...High Siding
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #5 on: August 18, 2014, 06:12:50 PM »
rear shock bottoming out aints good... it stresses the entire shock mechanism and will eventually cause the shock to snap...

works performance has been very good to us... our rs motobricks completely loaded 2up rolls across the truck scales at 1280 pounds...

so... ours were a special build... as they all should be... and neither have never bottomed out... even when they should had...

we donts mess around with cheep tiors and we donts mess around with cheep suspension...

without proper tiors and suspension... nothing else much matters...

j o
  • :johnny i parks my 96 eleven hundert rs motobrick in dodge county cheezconsin  :johnny

Offline Scott_

  • Administrator
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 2242
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #6 on: August 18, 2014, 06:18:17 PM »
......Don't know how a pair of 200 lbs riders w/ luggage would manage......

I would think that a K75 would be a little underpowered .......
  • My Garage
1995 K1100LT 0302044
2017 FLHTK Ultra Limited
1997 K1100LT 0302488 (R.I.P.)
1997 R1100RT ZC62149(sold)
"One who does not ask questions is ashamed to learn" Danish proverb

Offline johnny

  • TrailBrakingThrottleWhacker
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 7652
  • Whacking...n...Chopping Sliding...n...High Siding
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #7 on: August 18, 2014, 06:40:22 PM »
the k75 is a capable 2up moto... just gotts to keep the revs high...

we 2uped the brickus turkus through the socal mountains faster and smoother than on the 1100rs... its was freaking rad... on bias ply tiors butts a new rear shock...

that 93 k75s carving canyons was like riding a magic carpet... may eat drive shafts and final drives 2up loaded... butts what the hay...

j o

  • :johnny i parks my 96 eleven hundert rs motobrick in dodge county cheezconsin  :johnny

Offline F14CRAZY

  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 1091
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #8 on: August 18, 2014, 06:54:17 PM »
......Don't know how a pair of 200 lbs riders w/ luggage would manage......

I would think that a K75 would be a little underpowered .......

Didn't people tour the country on like, R60's with big azz Windjammer fairings and Krauser luggage? I mean they made it there and back just fine
  • Grand Rapids, MI
  • '87 K75C
'87 K75C w/ Pichler V1 fairing. LED's, CATZ driving lights, Audiovox cruise, LT top case, tons of other mods by Drake...


Offline stryder

  • ^ Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 53
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #9 on: August 18, 2014, 07:11:01 PM »
The cheapo Progressive 412 K75 shock is a almost a POS and is still probably a step-up from the K75 OEM shock from what I've read.

I eventually upgraded from a 412 to a Progressive 465 and it performs much better, for less than half of "a grand".

Modifying a rear shock with a plastic spacer sounds like a recipe for disaster to me.

Well I was thinking when I finally do replace it, it would be with another, stock shock, and that's gonna cost me.

The stock shock has lasted a good long time. More than that POS Progressive Shock, but it must have been the cheaper model, not the one you're talking about.

Well, it may be that no one else has tried to ramp up the "pre-load-ability" of the stock shock, so I'm going to try that bad boy modification and report back. If there's a safety concern I have it's with the front geometry changes and the possibility, perhaps the very remote possibility for wobbles/tank slappers, weird turn in etc. I'm not worried about the mod itself coming apart/off. It's in there pretty good, but you never know until you try. The bike's not due back on the road until Sept 1st, at which time I'll ride it down my "suspension set up road", i.e 5 miles of undulating pavement with many high speed compression hits, and that'll  give me great feed back right away.

This mod has been on my mind for quite some time, so I had to scratch the itch. 12 years ago I had a then new, sport touring bike that's still being made and still very popular today. One criticism about the "first gen" models was the supposedly weak shock, as in it needed a stiffer spring. One rider went out and bought a Wibur's or an Ohlins, I forget which, super duper shock for a boat load of money. Great shock, for sure. However, shortly thereafter, other riders were modifying their stock shock by adding a spacer/washer under the spring, for a total cost of about 5.00 plus their time/labour. Buddy with the super duper shock reported, he tried the mod on his stock unit, and...it performed as good as the super duper shock. True story.     
Southern Ontario, Canada.

Offline johnny

  • TrailBrakingThrottleWhacker
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 7652
  • Whacking...n...Chopping Sliding...n...High Siding
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #10 on: August 18, 2014, 08:01:54 PM »
shock snap... down... ambalance...





j o
  • :johnny i parks my 96 eleven hundert rs motobrick in dodge county cheezconsin  :johnny

Offline pdg

  • ^ Proficient Motobricker
  • Posts: 290
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #11 on: August 18, 2014, 08:15:51 PM »
If there's a safety concern I have it's with the front geometry changes and the possibility, perhaps the very remote possibility for wobbles/tank slappers, weird turn in etc. I'm not worried about the mod itself coming apart/off. It's in there pretty good, but you never know until you try.

The rear of my 75 sits over an inch higher than it did with the stock shock on full extension, which makes the forks steeper than original. Means reduced trail etc.

Also, my fluidbloc doesn't.... It's on the list 'to be looked at' sometime.

Overall, handling is much improved to my mind. Faster turn-in and easier to get round tight turns - no loss of straight line stability at any speed I've seen on any surface. If anything, stability is actually better because it's lost some of the 'laziness'.

As for the fate of my stock shock? It puked all it's oil all over the rear tyre and brake, which was nice. Once it lost any semblance of damping it felt better for the last 10 miles I did on it before putting it on the 'to be weighed in' pile. If your original shock has done enough work for the spring to sag I'd say the seals are on borrowed time.
1988 K75S

Offline stryder

  • ^ Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 53
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #12 on: August 19, 2014, 08:37:32 AM »
shock snap... down... ambalance...


j o

Ouch, that truly sucks. :-( What's the story behind that special K crash? I see the shock shaft snapped, but was that as a result of the crash, I see another bike down, or the reason for the crash, and if so, what caused the snap? Bottomed out? I see the tire has separated. 

The mod I effected should keep the bike/shock from bottoming out, but I won't know about topping out until I ride it. I figure of the approx 13mms added preload, maybe 1/2-1/3 of that is to make up for the spring sag and the rest is the added amount, i.e. maybe 5-7mms which shouldn't produce top outs IMO but I'll have to find out when riding it.
Southern Ontario, Canada.

Offline stryder

  • ^ Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 53
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #13 on: August 19, 2014, 08:38:25 AM »
If there's a safety concern I have it's with the front geometry changes and the possibility, perhaps the very remote possibility for wobbles/tank slappers, weird turn in etc. I'm not worried about the mod itself coming apart/off. It's in there pretty good, but you never know until you try.

The rear of my 75 sits over an inch higher than it did with the stock shock on full extension, which makes the forks steeper than original. Means reduced trail etc.

Also, my fluidbloc doesn't.... It's on the list 'to be looked at' sometime.

Overall, handling is much improved to my mind. Faster turn-in and easier to get round tight turns - no loss of straight line stability at any speed I've seen on any surface. If anything, stability is actually better because it's lost some of the 'laziness'.

As for the fate of my stock shock? It puked all it's oil all over the rear tyre and brake, which was nice. Once it lost any semblance of damping it felt better for the last 10 miles I did on it before putting it on the 'to be weighed in' pile. If your original shock has done enough work for the spring to sag I'd say the seals are on borrowed time.

That's great feedback thanks.  :2thumbup:

 
Southern Ontario, Canada.

Offline johnny

  • TrailBrakingThrottleWhacker
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 7652
  • Whacking...n...Chopping Sliding...n...High Siding
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #14 on: August 19, 2014, 09:03:28 AM »
the shaft snapped 2up... that took out the tior and everything else...

j o
  • :johnny i parks my 96 eleven hundert rs motobrick in dodge county cheezconsin  :johnny

Offline TimTyler

  • Adrninistrator
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 1884
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #15 on: August 19, 2014, 11:27:15 AM »
The pre-load adjustment screws on that pictured, snapped shock are all the way in the OFF position, which seems odd for a 2-up config.

Offline stryder

  • ^ Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 53
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #16 on: August 19, 2014, 01:29:41 PM »
The pre-load adjustment screws on that pictured, snapped shock are all the way in the OFF position, which seems odd for a 2-up config.

No, as in zero preload, riding 2 up, (really?) may have caused the shaft to snap as something's gotta give if/when the shock bottoms out for *who knows how many times*. (I read a report about an expert as in national racing champ, rider who continued to ride at high speed, 2 up, even when bottoming out his shock 6-7 times, causing major engine damage) Looks like the weakest point, the give, was the top of the shaft *if* that was the case. 

That's a shame. But, really, we are all at risk of a catastrophic shock failure/collapse. I've read enough stories like mine about blown seals while riding. The new R1200rt shock recall fiasco only drives the point home. What may have happened if that defect didn't show up until much later? Peeps would have felt 100% safe on their new bike, only to perhaps have sufferred a catastrohic faiulure. MG had something like that a while back too IIRC. So even though I appreciate that pic being posted and the good will behind it, we all take our chances that our equipment won't kill us, regardless of how new it might be, every time we throw a leg over.   
Southern Ontario, Canada.

Offline subforry

  • ^ Proficient Motobricker
  • Posts: 162
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #17 on: August 19, 2014, 02:47:12 PM »
Increasing the spring pre-load is kind of, but not quite, like increasing the spring rate.  The problem with increasing the spring rate is that the dampening and rebound valving is not stiff enough to match the spring.  Of course this doesn't matter because at 18 years+ age of our K bikes the stock shock has since leaked oil and lost pressure thus the valving is doing nothing.

If you are really attached to the stock shock then you could just buy a stiffer spring.
http://eibach.com/america/en/
  • Hermosa Beach, CA, USA
  • 1996 K1100RS
1981 Suzuki GS850G
1990 Suzuki Katana 1100 (GSX1100F) - sold
1996 BMW K1100RS
2009 BMW K1300GT

Offline F14CRAZY

  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 1091
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #18 on: August 19, 2014, 03:30:55 PM »
Would you rather ride on a questionable rear shock or trailbrake and whack the throttle on exit, because if you aints slidin you aints ridin?
  • Grand Rapids, MI
  • '87 K75C
'87 K75C w/ Pichler V1 fairing. LED's, CATZ driving lights, Audiovox cruise, LT top case, tons of other mods by Drake...


Offline Motorhobo

  • +25 years of K75
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 1530
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #19 on: August 19, 2014, 06:42:59 PM »
Would you rather ride on a questionable rear shock or trailbrake and whack the throttle on exit, because if you aints slidin you aints ridin?

Oh crap -- it's contagious.
1994/1995 K75 ABS Frankenbike: original engine 136k miles, frame from Gary Weaver (RIP), 173k miles -- Current Odometer: 198k miles
1994 K75 since 2013, 82,000 mi (19k mine) w/California Sidecar Friendship II Sidecar & Black Lab 'Miss B' - RIP

Past: 1974 Honda 550/4 (first bike), 1994 K75 (sold), 1995 K75 ABS (parts bike), Sidecar Dog & Best Bud 'Bo' - RIP

Offline johnny

  • TrailBrakingThrottleWhacker
  • ^ Quintessential Motobricker
  • Posts: 7652
  • Whacking...n...Chopping Sliding...n...High Siding
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #20 on: August 19, 2014, 09:45:06 PM »
the more i think about it the more im thinking car shock and car tiors...

 :curvy-road



johnny
  • :johnny i parks my 96 eleven hundert rs motobrick in dodge county cheezconsin  :johnny

Offline stryder

  • ^ Motobrick Curious
  • Posts: 53
Re: K75: add shock pre-load spacer
« Reply #21 on: September 21, 2014, 07:35:28 PM »
And so I rode the bike several times with the 13mm thick spacer and it was too much pre-load even on the lowest ramp setting...harsh ride. So I swapped it out for a 7mm spacer cut from a metal plumbing tube, and that works much better, more compliant on the lowest setting, but firmer than the highest setting without spacer, which is what I was after so I consider the mod a success re getting a few more miles out of a worn shock until I can get some extra scratch together for a good quality new unit.  :riding:
Southern Ontario, Canada.

Tags: