I don't consider it being "lucky" at all. That clutch assembly is considerably overbuilt. In fact, the very same clutch assembly was used on the 130hp K1200RS that generates 10-11% more torque than a K1100 and roughly 30% more torque than a K100. Then throw in the fact that even the K1200RS has a factor of safety built in and I'd say the chances of having a failure are somewhere between zero and none.
Not to mention that the size of those bolts is a standard size so they're most likely sized up from what would be theoretically required which means the factor of safety is most likely somewhat higher than would be required if they'd made a custom diameter bolt.
In order for those bolts to fail you'd need all six bolts and all three alignment pins to be under enough shear stress to all fail simultaneously. And, in the event that that did happen, all that would occur is that you'd lose power to the final drive.
I'm much more concerned about and think there's much more risk associated with a drive shaft U-joint failure on the four valve bikes as that can (and has for some riders) cause the rear end to lock up suddenly. I also think the braking system getting old (caliper pistons freezing or brake lines leaking/getting clogged) poses a much greater safety risk than re-using clutch bolts.
BTW: My undergrad degree is in engineering where I spent quite a lot of time studying the properties of metals (stress, strain, shear, fatigue, deformation, failure, blah, blah, blah....) and how things are designed.